Iāve been busy in my own little world, but I know itās time to check in with my blogāfor me, for my memories, and for the record of where I stand.
Thereās a lot going on in the world, and legacy media often decide which stories we should focus on. But many of us are drawn instead to voices we trustāthose who speak with truth and passion. Agreement isnāt the point; accuracy is. Without it, our heads fill with rubbish.
Recent controversies, like the BBCās handling of footage involving Donald Trump, show how damaging technology can be in the wrong hands. Editing, AI, and selective framing can distort reality, and when trusted brands are involved, the impact is even deeper. Accountability has to start somewhere. Media outlets and influencers with large followings carry responsibility: leadership should mean honesty, not manipulation.
It isnāt only politicians who are vulnerable. There have been cases where footage of deceased people appears in legal battles, or where historical emails and digital footprints are dragged into the light. These can be byproducts of AI misuse and smear campaignsāreminders of how fragile truth becomes when technology is weaponised.
And with the Epstein files, one part disgusts me deeply: if Prince Andrew did recruit men to bully his victim online and send worrying messages, then who are these men? Who took money to terrify a woman, and will they ever be held to account? It is a known fact that men are recruited to bully women without any moral conscience, and that behaviour must be named and condemned.
At the same time, we must acknowledge that not everyone who attended Epsteinās parties was complicit. Some were manipulated, or simply present without knowing the darker reality. Except those who knowingly enabled or profited from the exploitationāwhether Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or men recruited to bully victimsāmust be held to account. To terrify women for money shows a lack of moral conscience that cannot be excused.
Another danger lies in spyware. Modern tools allow men to invade womenās homes and workplaces digitally, creating pretend relationships to the point of believing they are real. This is something we should be focusing on. How many fathers, husbands, and friends of women are unaware their loved ones have had their spaces invaded by cowards hiding behind keyboards?
Anyway back to the BBC, simply suing a broadcaster may not be enough or the right option at all. Imagine instead the BBC being urged to craft a prime-time program, promoted widely, that educates the public on how editing and digital tools can bend the truth. People deserve to know how easily bias and radicalisation can slip through their screens.
When Iām out in the community, I notice how younger men in particular look up to Donald Trump. Us Northerners tend to respect people who āsay it as it is.ā Whether you agree or not, dismissing that perspective without reflection risks misunderstanding. Iām entitled to my opinions, just as you are to yours.
On wider issues, I believe women deserve respect for their choices. Sex work has always existed, and while exploitation must be condemned and survivors protected, not every woman is forced into it. To assume weakness offends me. For clarity: I am not a sex worker, but I admire any woman who stands in her power and makes her own decisions. Empowerment looks different for everyoneāwhether itās choosing a profession, or even posing nude with confidence. Each to their own. Life is too short to chase misery or revenge.
The internet, sadly, has become a playground for cowardsāfakehood, revenge, and malice thrive there. Iāve felt it myself. Thatās why I keep my focus on my own projects and growth, rather than poking into othersā business. Malicious intent is something Iāll never understand.
And back to Trump: whether you like him or not, heās endured burdens most of us canāt imagine. He isnāt part of secret cults or handshakes; he identifies as Christian. Each to their own. Donāt shoot the messengerāread my āAbout Meā page if you want to know who I am. And if you donāt like meāwhether youāre a relative, former neighbour, influencer, comedian, or bookwormāthen simply go away. The interest will never be mutual.
Most importantly, remember this: most people are good and lovely. We should not let the cowardice and weakness in others destroy our right to enjoy our individual journeys.
I do feel enormously disappointed about the BBC, who do have a reputation for bias and fake news. Though I hope this can be resolved amicably, as the BBC also boast some great travel, geographical and baking shows, for example. And I have often felt unable to sleep before watching a few documentaries of such content, that broaden my horizons.








